Non-naturalistic moral explanation

نویسندگان
چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Order Effects in Moral Judgment. Searching for an Explanation

Research on moral judgment has shown that the order in which dilemmas are presented to subjects often has a strong influence on their judgment. However, the psychological mechanisms underlying order effects are still opaque. In this paper we aimed to isolate the features that a scenario must exhibit in order to influence judgment of subsequent scenarios. For this enterprise, we identified sever...

متن کامل

24.230 Paper 1: Can moral facts be an explanation?

24.230 Prof. Khoo Can moral facts be an explanation? An important question that has played a role in the debate between moral naturalism and non-naturalism is whether or not there are any moral explanations of non-moral facts. In this paper, I aim to describe two major positions in the debate and give reasons why I think that, if moral facts exist and are objective, moral explanations are possi...

متن کامل

Title : Expectation and Evaluation in Moral and Non - Moral Contexts

Copyright Information: All rights reserved unless otherwise indicated. Contact the author or original publisher for any necessary permissions. eScholarship is not the copyright owner for deposited works. Learn more at People's evaluations of events often depend on their expectations about those events. There is often disappointment when events fail to meet expectations—sometimes even when the e...

متن کامل

The Non-moral Basis of Cognitive Biases of Moral Intuitions

Against moral intuitionism, which holds that moral intuitions can be non-inferentially justified, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong argues that moral intuitions are unreliable and must be confirmed to be justified (i.e. must be justified inferentially) because they are subject to cognitive biases. However, I suggest this is merely a renewed version of the argument from disagreement against intuitionism....

متن کامل

the critical analysis of jeff jordan’s view on religious experience and its naturalistic explanation

if we discover an adequate naturalistic explanation for religious experience, will it diminish its evidentiary value? in response to this question, many thinkers such as c.d. broad, richard swinburne and william wainwright argue that an adequate naturalistic explanation cannot diminish religious experience evidentiary value unless it can be demonstrated that there is no god. in contrary to this...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Synthese

سال: 2019

ISSN: 0039-7857,1573-0964

DOI: 10.1007/s11229-019-02341-3